How one change in the public record becomes a decision your team can stand behind
Pyrnova™ is one environment, not six applications. The products are different questions asked of the same record, so the work of one carries into the next without being re-entered or re-explained.
Follow a recompete through Pyrnova
An agency publishes a sources sought notice
On 22 September 2026, an agency issues a sources sought notice for logistics engineering support. Nothing in it names your company or your current delivery order.
It appears among other federal records in this illustrative scenario. On its own it reads as routine market research.
Scout reads it and groups it with what it relates to
Scout reads the notice from its source record and places it with related developments on the same subject: an earlier modification to your order and a budget line for the same program office.
Three independent records now point at the same requirement. Scout marks the convergence and how quickly the subject is moving.
Strike decides it is material to you, and records why
Measured against your contracts, the notice overlaps four of the five task areas on your incumbent order, which ends in 60 days. Strike records a Material Change™: likely recompete, high materiality, medium confidence.
It states what would overturn the judgement (an option year recorded before the end date) and what it cannot yet establish (whether the successor will be set aside).
Atlas shows who else is in the picture
Atlas places the requirement in its structure: the program office, the companies holding adjacent awards, and the subcontractors who receive sub-awards from you on the current order.
Moving the year scale shows how those relationships have shifted since the order began, as they were recorded at each date.
Vector follows the consequence if the assessment holds
Vector traces the recorded chain from the assessment: the revenue tied to the order, the subcontract work that depends on it, the capture timeline a recompete would require.
It also sets out branches that would break the chain, such as an extension or a set-aside, each written as a hypothetical rather than a forecast.
Your team records its judgement
Your capture lead reviews the change and records a disposition: pursue the successor, and contact the program office before the solicitation is drafted.
The judgement is attached to this version of the assessment. If the evidence changes, the record shows what you decided and what you knew when you decided it.
The outcome is observed, and the record learns
When the solicitation or award appears in the public record, Pyrnova links it back to the change. Whether the assessment held is recorded against it.
That history is how your team, and Pyrnova’s reading of your market, improves over time. Until then, the outcome stays open and says so.
The shared record underneath
Every stage reads and writes one record. Core and PyrAI™ sit beneath the four products, which is what lets a judgement made in Strike™ appear, unchanged, beside the structure in Atlas™.
Configured around your business
What counts as material depends on what you hold, pursue and depend on. Pyrnova is configured to that before it tells you anything.
What Pyrnova will not do
Rank by a hidden score
Every list names its order and explains it in a sentence. Materiality and confidence are never merged into one number.
Fill a gap with a guess
What is not evidenced is stated as not evidenced. A missing record is never treated as proof that nothing happened.
Decide for you
Pyrnova recommends and records. The decision, and the record of who made it, belongs to your team.
Read the method behind the record
See how evidence, assessment and uncertainty are kept distinct.